|
Return
to Perspectives on The Passion
A Review of Mel Gibson's The Passion of Christ
by Keith A. Fournier
I
really did not know what to expect. I was thrilled to have been invited
to a private viewing of Mel Gibson's film The Passion, but I had
also read all the cautious articles and spin.
I grew up in a Jewish town and owe much of my own faith journey to the
influence. I have a life long, deeply held aversion to anything that might
even indirectly encourage any form of anti-Semitic thought, language or
actions.
I arrived at the private viewing for The Passion, held in Washington
D.C., and greeted some familiar faces. The environment was typically Washingtonian,
with people greeting you with a smile but seeming to look beyond you,
having an agenda beyond the words.
The
film was very briefly introduced, without fanfare, and then the Room darkened.
From the gripping opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, to the very
human and tender portrayal of the earthly ministry of Jesus, through the
betrayal, the arrest, the scourging, the way of the cross, the encounter
with the thieves, the surrender on the Cross, until the final scene in
the empty tomb, this was not simply a movie; it was an encounter, unlike
anything I have ever experienced.
In addition to being a masterpiece of film-making and an artistic triumph,
The Passion evoked more deep reflection, sorrow and emotional reaction
within me than anything since my wedding, my ordination or the birth of
my children. Frankly, I will never be the same.
When the film concluded, this 'invitation only' gathering of 'movers and
shakers'in Washington,D.C. were shaking indeed, but this time from sobbing.
I am not sure there was a dry eye in the place. The crowd that had been
glad-handing before the film was now eerily silent. No one could speak,
because words were woefully inadequate. We had experienced a kind of art
that is a rarity in life, the kind that makes heaven touch earth.
One scene in the film has now been forever etched in my mind. A brutalized,
wounded Jesus was soon to fall again, under the weight of the cross. His
mother had made her way along the Via Della Rosa. As she ran to him, she
flashed back to a memory of Jesus as a child, falling in the dirt road
outside of their home. Just as she reached, to protect him from the fall,
she was now reaching to touch his wounded adult face. Jesus looked at
her with intensely probing and passionately loving eyes (and at all of
us through the screen) and said, "Behold, I make all things new."
These are words taken from the last book of the New Testament, the Book
Of Revelations. Suddenly, the purpose of the pain was so clear and
the wounds, that earlier in the film had been so difficult to see in His
face, His back, indeed all over His body, became intensely beautiful.
They had been borne, voluntarily, for love.
At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a question
and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film, from a rather
diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The
questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even
though it has not yet even been released: "Why is this film considered
by some to be "anti-Semitic?"
Frankly, having now experienced (you do not 'view' this film) The Passion,
it is a question that is impossible to answer. A law professor whom I
admire sat in front of me. He raised his hand and responded, "After
watching this film, I do not understand how anyone can insinuate that
it even remotely presents that the Jews killed Jesus. It doesn't."
He continued, "It made me realize that my sins killed Jesus."
I agree.
There
is not a scintilla of anti-Semitism to be found anywhere in this powerful
film. If there were, I would be among the first to decry it. It faithfully
tells the Gospel story in a dramatically beautiful, sensitive and profoundly
engaging way. Those who are alleging otherwise have either not seen the
film or have another agenda behind their protestations.
This is not a 'Christian' film, in the sense that it will appeal only
to those who identify themselves as followers of Jesus Christ. It is a
deeply human, beautiful story that will deeply touch all men and women.
It is a profound work of art. Yes, its producer is a Catholic Christian
and thankfully has remained faithful to the Gospel text; if that is no
longer acceptable behavior, then we are all in trouble. History demands
that we remain faithful to the story, and Christians have a right to tell
it.
After all, we believe that it is the greatest story ever told and that
its message is for all men and women. The greatest right is the right
to hear the truth.
We would all be well advised to remember that the Gospel narratives, to
which The Passion is so faithful, were written by Jewish men who
followed a Jewish rabbi, whose life and teaching have forever changed
the history of the world. The problem is not the message, but those who
have distorted it and used it for hate, rather than love. The solution
is not to censor the message, but rather, to promote the kind of gift
of love that is Mel Gibson's film making masterpiece, The Passion.
It should be seen by as many people as possible. I intend to do everything
I can to make sure that is the case. I am passionate about The Passion.
You will be, as well. Don't miss it!
Keith A. Fournier is a constitutional lawyer and a graduate of
the John Paul II Institute of the Lateran University, Franciscan University
and the University of Pittsburgh. He holds degrees in philosophy, theology
and law. He has been a champion of religious liberty and appeared as co-counsel
in major cases at the United States Supreme Court. He is the author of
seven books and, along with his law practice, serves as the president
of both the Your Catholic Voice Foundation and Common Good.
Send
this story to a friend.
|